be a ring with unity.

Lemma

Let be a simple -module. If , then .

Proposition

If is an isomorphism with and are simple and each ‘s and ‘s are non-isomorphic. Then and such that and .

Proof

Let be the isomorphism. Since it is injective such that . Then by the Schur’s lemma, . Hence, for each , uniquely exists such that . Otherwise, . Also, since is an isomorphism. Therefore, there exists a permutation .

Corollary

If is a finite direct sum of simple modules, then the isomorphism class of simple components of , and multiplicities are well-defined.


From the proposition, is a block diagonal matrix of . For example,

where is a map between .

Therefore, we can call is an block decomposition.

For the Semi Simple Ring

Now, we can decompose semi simple ring , using the proof of AW, as where .

In a mathematical language, this is the theorem1.

Let be semisimple ring, and let be an -module . Then

and is the submodule of consisting of the sum of all simple submodules isomorphic to where , , and are the things in Artin-Weddenburn Theorem context.

Corollary

  1. Let be semi simple ring. Then every simple module is isomorphicc to one of the simple left ideals .
  2. A simple ring has exactly one simple module, up to isomorphism. So that .

Non Trivial Central Idempotent

Different Point of View, it is same as finding orthogonal non trivial central idempotents.

External and Internal Decomposition

External

If there are rings , we can construct explicitly as a product ring .

As a block decomposition

Internal

Let be a ring, then we have a block decomposition where ‘s are 2-sided ideals. Also, as we proved in Artin-Weddenburn Theorem, is a ring itself. However it is not a subring of R because it has different unity.

So as a ring, it is not a direct sum of rings, it is a coproduct in ring category.

Footnotes

  1. Theorem 4.4 in Lang page. 653