be a ring with unity.
Lemma
Let be a simple -module. If , then .
Proof
Proposition
If is an isomorphism with and are simple and each ‘s and ‘s are non-isomorphic. Then and such that and .
Proof
Let be the isomorphism. Since it is injective such that . Then by the Schur’s lemma, . Hence, for each , uniquely exists such that . Otherwise, . Also, since is an isomorphism. Therefore, there exists a permutation .
Corollary
If is a finite direct sum of simple modules, then the isomorphism class of simple components of , and multiplicities are well-defined.
From the proposition, is a block diagonal matrix of . For example,
where is a map between .
Therefore, we can call is an block decomposition.
For the Semi Simple Ring
Now, we can decompose semi simple ring , using the proof of AW, as where .
In a mathematical language, this is the theorem1.
Let be semisimple ring, and let be an -module . Then
and is the submodule of consisting of the sum of all simple submodules isomorphic to where , , and are the things in Artin-Weddenburn Theorem context.
Corollary
- Let be semi simple ring. Then every simple module is isomorphicc to one of the simple left ideals .
- A simple ring has exactly one simple module, up to isomorphism. So that .
Non Trivial Central Idempotent
Different Point of View, it is same as finding orthogonal non trivial central idempotents.
External and Internal Decomposition
External
If there are rings , we can construct explicitly as a product ring .
As a block decomposition
Internal
Let be a ring, then we have a block decomposition where ‘s are 2-sided ideals. Also, as we proved in Artin-Weddenburn Theorem, is a ring itself. However it is not a subring of R because it has different unity.
So as a ring, it is not a direct sum of rings, it is a coproduct in ring category.
Footnotes
-
Theorem 4.4 in Lang page. 653 ↩