Let be a ring with unity .
Module Case
Equivalent Statements
Let be an -module. Then the following are equivalent
- is a sum of simple -module. (SS1)
- is a direct sum of simple -module. (SS2)
- For all submodule of , there exists such that . (SS3)
Proof
SS1 implies SS2 by the Lemma.
SS2 SS3
Suppose where ‘s are simple. Let be maximal such that . Then for all , by the maximality, . And do the similar argument with SS1 to SS2.
SS3 SS1
Let . Then by SS3, for some submodule . Suppose . Then there is a simple submodule by the lemma2, so it contradicts to the direct sum. There which implies SS1 holds.
Remark
For SS3, for any monomorphism splits, i.e. there exists such that . (SS3`)
So also equivalent to a short exact sequence splits.(SS3“)
Lemma
- If where ‘s are Simple Module, the there exist such that
Proof
Let be maximal such that . By the maximality, for all satisfies . Since is simple, so that .
- Let aIf satisfies SS3, then there exists simple .
Proof
Definition of Semi-simple module
A -module is semi simple module if it satisfies one of the Equivalent Statements.
Example
For ring and be a -module .
Proposition
Every quotient and submodule of semi simple module is semi simple.
Proof
Quotient
Let with is a semi simple, i.e. where ‘s are simple. Then . Since , or simple. Therefore satisfies SS1.
Submodule
Let where is semi simple. Then by SS3, and the result from the quotient, is semi simple.
Ring
Definition
Ring is semi simple if is a semi simple -module as itself.
Proposition
If is a semi simple ring, then all -modules are semi simple.
Proof
All modules are quotient of the free module. Since, quotient module is semi simple, all modules are semi simple.